A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Or the serum - do they know the genotype of the donor?
-
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17-2hi7-fNsjE44himeCkm1PoZ7_-ncvpxUlhShZzDCU/edit On another note - I just popped a *nearly clean draft* of a proposed Virological post about Cambodian, Thai and Japanese bat sarbecoviruses. It's actually pretty mild, but Alina etc. *do* get attention. I borrowed VERY heavily from this channel,so please let me know if you are co-authors or I can go solo...
-
These are clinical trials - so wildtype
-
What's critically important here - drop in efficacy, even bigger than drop observed in vitro
-
2021-02-07 12:31
Kristian G. Andersen
(which is not surprising to me)
-
But do they know whether the infected cases are with a B.1.351 with Leif and/or Karen or one without
-
I think it's the problem that spike is wild-type - not stabilized as in the mRNA vaccines - am I right about this?
-
Good question - they really should have sequence data in the breakthrus -
-
> But do they know whether the infected cases are with a B.1.351 with Leif and/or Karen or one without Ah, yes, good point - I assumed with all those, but yeah, they're not all fixed. I assume likely all three > I think it's the problem that spike is wild-type - not stabilized as in the mRNA vaccines - am I right about this? Not stabilized - like Sputnik. Why they did that, I don't know. Why they haven't updated it, I don't know. Fact is, in six months, that vaccine will be totally irrelevant.