Sara Selgrade

Please go over or have someone go over to the VRC to get the 3D model of the entire hemagglutinin molecule as well as the model of the nanoparticle with the attached HA stem (the one that I showed at the recent Congressional Hearing).

Gates Package, p.342 · original PDF · in context

Hello all, Background As you may be aware, the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, as well as the House Energy and Commerce Committee, have requested documents related to EcoHealth Alliance's NIH grants.

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

Please note that we suggested that OLPA should also consult with the Center for Scientific Review. < File: February 14 2019 Type 2 Summary Statement.pdf >> its 2n << File: AWS3993758 9.15.21.pdf >> << File: AWS3672471 7.15.20.pdf >> << File: AWS3438397 8.5.19.pdf >> << File: AWS3424934 7.24.19.pdf >> There are actually 6 award IV << File: December 18 2013 Summary Statement (1).pdf >> << File: February 14 2019 Type 2 Summary Statement.pdf >> NIH OLPA questions related to these documents: 1.

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

Energy & Commerce Committee Request (Follow up to prior document production consisting of Type 5 Checklists from the initial R01): Questions from the congressional staff, with proposed responses from NIH OER in red: Following up on the production of the Type 5 checklist documents, we noticed there was not an Award Worksheet Report for Year 6 of the EcoHealth award or Year 1 of the EcoHealth R02 award (depending on how you look at it).

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

Based on this HHS OIG report (see excerpt below), the NIH may have closeout documentation for the EcoHealth R01 award. https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-11-00190.pdf.

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

However, we would like clarification on the following: When a grant award is renewed, do NIH staff complete closeout documentation for the R01 grant in lieu of the Award Worksheet Report?

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

If there is closeout documentation for the EcoHealth R01, please provide these materials as responsive to the request for the grant file.

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

NIH Response: There is no closeout documentation at this time, because the award continued with the renewal (Type 2).

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

If instead there is no closeout documentation and there is an Award Worksheet Report, please provide the Year 6 Award Worksheet Report and any other subsequent Award Worksheet Reports.

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

NIH Response: The Year 6 Award Worksheet Reports are attached. << File: AWS4298904 9.28.22.pdf >> << File: AWS3993758 9.15.21.pdf >> << File: AWS3672471 7.15.20.pdf >> << File: AWS3602757 4.27.20.pdf >> << File: AWS3438397 8.5.19.pdf >> << File: AWS3424934 7.24.19.pdf >> For background - OER/OPERA Response: Thanks to our OPERA colleagues, we can offer the following explanation.

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

There are actually 6 award worksheets for the Type 2 due to the actions outlined below: · 7-24-19: initial award · 8-5-19: budget adjustment · 4-27-20: termination--award zero'd out · 7-15-20: award reinstated · 9-15-21: award extended (mid-budget period) · 9-28-22: WIV termination; budget renegotiated to remove aims involving WIV NIH OLPA questions related to these responses/documents: Please let us know if you have any concerns or flags Sara Selgrade, Ph.D.

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

These two rosters can be found: https://public.era.nih.gov/pubroster/preRosindex.era?AGENDA=265100&CID=102597 https: Tough Q/As: Did the NIH grant to EcoHealth Alliance with a subaward to WIV support ePPP research? public.era.nih.gov/pubroster/preRosindex.era?AGENDA=356932&CID=102597

Reading Room Production, p.198 · original PDF · in context

Please see high level points here and additional background below. © WIV-1 the virus studied at RML in 2016 and published in 2018 is not a progenitor to.

Reading Room Production, p.186 · original PDF · in context

SARS-CoV-2. © WIV-1is a naturally occurring bat coronavirus and is named WIV-1 because scientists at WIV were the first to discover and characterize the virus. © RML researchers did not receive the virus or bats from WIV. * RML followed standard procedures to procure the bats for research and used a USDA approved licensed dealer.

Reading Room Production, p.186 · original PDF · in context

Topline points: • Strengthening biosafety and biosecurity oversight of life sciences research is a key priority of this Administration, as outlined in the National Biodefense Strategy.

Reading Room Production, p.171 · original PDF · in context

As such, we do not support this legislation. • The Administration has recently strengthened, streamlined, and expanded oversight of potentially high risk life science research in the May 2024 United States Government Policy for Oversight of Dual Use Research of Concern Pathogens with Enhanced Pandemic Potential ("DURC/PEPP policy").

Reading Room Production, p.171 · original PDF · in context

We would appreciate your review and any edits by 10am Monday, July 15th.

Reading Room Production, p.115 · original PDF · in context

We would appreciate your review and any edits by 10am Monday, July 15th.

Reading Room Production, p.170 · original PDF · in context