Reads to me that are pissed off that they were not involved inour paper and so want to get in on the act.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.5 · original PDF · in context
Drafting, review and publication of the 'Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2' paper and related messaging.
| Person | Documents |
|---|---|
| Robert F. Garry | 49 |
| Kristian G. Andersen | 31 |
| Edward C. Holmes | 25 |
| Sara Selgrade | 13 |
| Andrew Rambaut | 8 |
| Christina Salazar | 8 |
| Anthony S. Fauci | 4 |
| Christine Sizemore | 4 |
| David Spiro | 4 |
| Ralph S. Baric | 4 |
| Clare Thomas | 2 |
| Francis S. Collins | 2 |
| Bill Gates | 1 |
| Carole Heilman | 1 |
| Heidi E Avery | 1 |
| Jennifer Routh | 1 |
| Kristian G. Andersen M | 1 |
| Robert Eiss | 1 |
High-confidence terms:
proximal origin nature medicine the paper we wrote our paper andersen et al
Supporting terms (these are why broad topics over-fire):
draft preprint virological.org manuscript referee reviewer submission
Own-voice statements only, in date order. Quoted and hedged material is excluded — see any person's page for the full strata.
Reads to me that are pissed off that they were not involved inour paper and so want to get in on the act.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.5 · original PDF · in context
oppps...."One *Nature Medicine paper* further indicated that the pandemic virus shows no signs of having been engineered by scientists, another contention of conspiracy theorists.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.6 · original PDF · in context
Ihave a few questions on which I would value your input related to the recent paper that you co-authored in Nature Medicine.In the first instance I was hoping for a brief background chat over the phone, but alternatively, if easier we couldconverse over email.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.33 · original PDF · in context
In addition, they completely fail to note that it was Clare that suggested Nature Medicine!!
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.113 · original PDF · in context
We believe that RB is either Reviewer 2 of our paper, or Reviewer 2shared confidential information with RB.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.119 · original PDF · in context
Clearly, individual B is either Reviewer 2 of our paper, or Reviewer 2 shared confidential information with them.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.120 · original PDF · in context
It does not appear that individual B knew that you discussed the paper directly with Nature Medicine, nor does it appear that the person knew who the handling editor was at that journal (Joao).We are very sorry to have to bring this to your attention, but given how serious a matter this is, we feel we have nochoice as our scientific reputations are being judged.Please let us know if you have any questions.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.120 · original PDF · in context
Mightbe coming - that BillyBostickson persona, who is documenting the ties of the Proximal Origins authors to the CCP, has ties to Alex Berenson.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.192 · original PDF · in context
Earlier cases in Wuhan would not be all that much of a surprise (of course that was predicted in Proximal Origins).
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.247 · original PDF · in context
In addition, they completely fail to note that it was Clare that suggested Nature Medicine!!
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.279 · original PDF · in context
I mean, that post has more views than our Proximal Origin post....
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.407 · original PDF · in context
No doubt there will be opportunities to make the appropriate points since this whole Proximal Origins thing is not leaving the news cycles anytime soon.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.636 · original PDF · in context
@Eddie Holmes He's basically reiterating what we said in our paper - but people apparently still don't get it.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.840 · original PDF · in context
As a Proximal Origins author you are imbued with near God-like power toinfluence group-think in virology.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.845 · original PDF · in context
My colleagues and I have not stopped doing so since we wrote Proximal Origins.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.869 · original PDF · in context
Thanks in advance for clarifying these details, which do seem pertinent to the methods described in our paper and therefore we do have to ask.
Reading Room Production, p.80 · original PDF · in context
All of our conclusions were written in our published and peer-reviewed papers (i.e., inNature Medicine and then updated in Cell late last year).
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1050 · original PDF · in context
All of the emails show the establishment of the hypotheseswe later outlined in the Proximal Origins paper and then the assessment of these based on the available evidence.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1050 · original PDF · in context
I have a feeling that the final words have not yet been written about the Origins of Proximal Origins.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1053 · original PDF · in context
All of the emails regarding the teleconference show the establishment of the hypotheses we later outlined in the Proximal Origins paper and then the assessment of these based on the available evidence.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1053 · original PDF · in context
All of our conclusions were written in our published and peer-reviewed papers (i.e., in Nature Medicine and then updated in Cell late last year).
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1053 · original PDF · in context
For example, Since we wrote Proximal Origins we've seen betacoronaviruses that have similar sequences (almost but not quite aFCS) in that region, like RmYN02.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1053 · original PDF · in context
All of the emails regarding the teleconference show the establishment of the hypotheses we later outlined in the Proximal Origins paper and then the assessment of these based on the available evidence.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1054 · original PDF · in context
All of our conclusions were written in our published and peer-reviewed papers (i.e., in Nature Medicine and then updated in Cell late last year).
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1054 · original PDF · in context
All of the emails regarding the teleconference show the establishment of the hypotheses we later outlined in the Proximal Origins paper and then the assessment of these based on the available *scientific* evidence.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1054 · original PDF · in context
All of our conclusions were written in our published and peer-reviewed papers (i.e., in Nature Medicine and ~then updated~ in Cell late last year).
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1054 · original PDF · in context
In this article I suggest that the scientific consensus reached around the possibility of a laboratory origin for SARS-CoV-2, driven in large part by the seminal Proximal Origin paper, may have been unduly influenced by the political ramifications of the hypothesis.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1066 · original PDF · in context
I don't like the way it has mixed our paper with the Lancet letter.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1087 · original PDF · in context
I would also wait until after our papers are published as they will totally move the goalposts
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1088 · original PDF · in context
Straight from our paper - "The genomic features described here may explain in part the infectiousness and transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 inhumans.
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1093 · original PDF · in context
We had common interests, but we didn't effectively start working together until later in 2014, on some of the work on the 2015 paper, that was published in Nature Medicine.
Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), p.22 · original PDF · in context
There's some that believe that you may have been a reviewer of Proximal Origins.
Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), p.75 · original PDF · in context