Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1026 [SLACK_001240] · slack_pm:msg:10723

Date: 2021-11-24 08:50
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

So if you were going to pick a virus from amongst your large bank of samples in which to try popping a FCS insertion you would pick out one with QTQT?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-11-24 08:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup - almost looks step-wise.
2021-11-24 08:46 Robert F. Garry open

Indeed - that's always puzzled me.
2021-11-24 08:48 Andrew Rambaut open

What would it do without the PRRA insert?
2021-11-24 08:48 Robert F. Garry open

I've think that the enzymes that do the cleavage at R/S also probably benefit by having a "landing pad."
2021-11-24 08:50 Andrew Rambaut

So if you were going to pick a virus from amongst your large bank of samples in which to try popping a FCS insertion you would pick out one with QTQT?
2021-11-24 08:52 Robert F. Garry open

Not without having all the knowledge in hindsight.
2021-11-24 08:52 Andrew Rambaut open

Fair enough. I won't tweet that then.
2021-11-24 08:52 Robert F. Garry open

Same argument with the O-linked glycans - without having SC2 as the guidepost - you would not know....
2021-11-24 08:53 Robert F. Garry open

Good - that would just encourage the Leakers...

Full conversation →