Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.113 [SLACK_000327] · slack_pm:msg:01155

Date: 2020-07-27 19:50
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes
Topics: Proximal Origin paper

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I'm not sure what I would conclude except that it is completely inappropriate to discuss the thoughts of the editors atNature. In addition, they completely fail to note that it was Clare that suggested Nature Medicine!! Clare seems tohave rejected the paper largely on the grounds that she thought it would go out of date quickly.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
In addition, they completely fail to note that it was Clare that suggested Nature Medicine!!	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

In addition, they completely fail to note that it was Clare that suggested Nature Medicine!!

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-07-27 17:29 Edward C. Holmes open

Agreed. I've now emailed Jeremy.
2020-07-27 18:12 Edward C. Holmes open

On the plus side, this may be the Altmetric boost we need...
2020-07-27 18:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

Exactly!
2020-07-27 19:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

Obviously the person writing the email... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-07-27 at 7.02.03 PM.png]
2020-07-27 19:50 Edward C. Holmes

I'm not sure what I would conclude except that it is completely inappropriate to discuss the thoughts of the editors atNature. In addition, they completely fail to note that it was Clare that suggested Nature Medicine!! Clare seems tohave rejected the paper largely on the grounds that she thought it would go out of date quickly.
2020-07-27 19:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, but only a reviewer would be privy to this information - nobody on the call (unless they reviewed the paper) would know this.
2020-07-27 20:03 Edward C. Holmes open

May be. I dunno.
2020-07-27 20:07 Kristian G. Andersen open

It's possible Ron was that reviewer too - and then just relayed the whole story to Ralph. More likely, Ralph was the reviewer and talked to Ron about it and Ron probably said "that's funny, let me tell you something...". Ralph then got pissed when he saw Jon's article - once again not citing him - with our quotes once again stating that this is a natural virus. In the Baric universe, I could see how that would blow a fuse.
2020-07-27 20:08 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, that makes sense to me.

Full conversation →