A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
@Eddie Holmes https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2021/05/19/coronavirus-origins It's remarkable to me how "rationale people" writing about Bloomshit avoid the obvious --- if you think that WIV had SC2 or something very close and didn't tell anyone HOW in the hell is this _not_ a conspiracy theory. Won't responsible commentary orjournalism maybe mention that?
-
@Eddie Holmes At least some of the comments are reasonable. Molecular Biologist is spot on.
-
I'm on that paper and did most of the phylogenetic...
-
Noticed that and guessed that - It's a really important piece of work. Trying to figure out how best to do it justice inthe Commentary.
-
2021-05-19 14:34
Kristian G. Andersen
@Eddie Holmes He's basically reiterating what we said in our paper - but people apparently still don't get it.
-
@Eddie Holmes Why Derek felt the need to write this, I don't know. It's as if anybody with a science background - orno science background - feels qualified to comment on what is an extremely complex issue. Again, these people just can't get past the fact it started in Wuhan.
-
@Eddie Holmes (but they apparently don't have any issues with a researcher magically picking up the next pandemic virus from a bat butt. Okay, then - A+ for stats).
-
@Eddie Holmes And shows why the conspiracy theorists are so keen to attack the pangolin data
-
@Eddie Holmes It's a really inconvenient piece of evidence. It's the one thing that solidified my belief.