Slack / Private Message Drop — page 791
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001005
← p.790 p.792 → · this page in the original PDF · package
accidental lab escape idea has no such selection - samples are collected from bats over a limited time period and
limited geographical area
• SARS1 also associated with animal market
• The closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is not from the WIV: i.e. it's not RaTG13 because sequence similarity varies so
much across the genome because of recombination. RpYN06 is closest in most genes.
• No mention of SARS-CoV-2 in old theses from WIV, including from 2019.
https://twitter.com/TheSeeker268/status/1392575191763472388?s=20
[2021-05-12 23:18:12]
[Kristian Andersen]
Yeah, not arguments - just speculations from him. I think it's worth engaging - clearly they haven't really thought that
hard about it.
Probably also worth having a little cheat-list of direct evidence for natural emergence because I see this coming up
more and more. The only thing we're missing is an intermediate host - that may or may exist - or even existed.
[2021-05-12 23:19:18]
[Eddie Holmes]
Let's sleep on it an do it carefully
[2021-05-12 23:21:43]
[Andrew Rambaut]
You don't really need to get into the individual arguments I think - just address the non equivalence of saying there is
no evidence for either hypothesis - one has a prior probability that is vanishingly small so requires at least some
evidence the natural hypothesis is everything else.
[2021-05-12 23:22:19]
[Kristian Andersen]
Yeah, but the prior doesn't work with them because, Wuhan.
[2021-05-12 23:22:54]
[Eddie Holmes]
I would add: 1. Long evolutionary gap to Yunnan bats. 2. Yunnan bats look close because they mainly sampled
Yunnan bats. 3. Two lineages in Wuhan at different markets. 4. No reason not a publish a closer virus before the
pandemic.
[2021-05-12 23:23:42]
[Andrew Rambaut]
I love this one:
> --Closest known (not that close) viral relatives in nature are ~1000 miles from Wuhan
So the known relatives are not the close relatives and thus the fact they are far away is expected.
[2021-05-12 23:24:40]
[Kristian Andersen]
Andrew you nailed that one way back - Ebola virus in West Africa...
[2021-05-12 23:24:53]
[Andrew Rambaut]
> To call this scenario a "conspiracy theory" is inappropriate and unfair to everyone involved.
[2021-05-12 23:25:20]
[Eddie Holmes]
Send them this to explain the point: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MMiKyfd6hA0
[2021-05-12 23:26:56]
[Andrew Rambaut]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/791
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:08231 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 790–791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08232 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08233 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08234 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08235 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08236 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08237 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08238 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08239 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08240 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791 |
| slack_pm:msg:08241 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791–792 |