Slack / Private Message Drop — page 792
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001006
← p.791 p.793 → · this page in the original PDF · package
> I would never hang my hat on any of it.
But I would send a letter to Science
[2021-05-12 23:30:02]
[Eddie Holmes]
False equivalence is that the gamey tasting menu is full of bloody viruses (although we can't use this). Some of
these animals were sick and sold.
[2021-05-12 23:30:09]
[Kristian Andersen]
Andrew - any chance you can please write a point about the likelihood? Basically what you already have but in a few
sentences?
[2021-05-12 23:30:48]
[Kristian Andersen]
> False equivalence is that the gamey tasting menu is full of bloody viruses (although we can't use this). Some of
these animals were sick and sold.
I honestly don't understand we aren't all already dead - it's a fucking miracle.
[2021-05-12 23:32:40]
[Eddie Holmes]
5. Virus is adapted to spread in multiple hosts (e.g. mink). 6. Same RBD found in pangolins so it is in nature.
[2021-05-12 23:33:46]
[Kristian Andersen]
"No evidence either way".
Sure. Until you think about it.
[2021-05-12 23:35:45]
[Kristian Andersen]
Alright, off to bed for me - I'll pick it up again tomorrow (unless somebody wants to answer before - I might waste too
much time again... :wink: . :beer:
[2021-05-12 23:37:01]
[Eddie Holmes]
Yes, get some rest
[2021-05-13 04:10:58]
[Robert Garry]
Oh yeah - Relman is piece of work. Did not get power on until after 7pm last night - Internet back on after 1am. The
trees - one oak about 2/3 meter in diameter - down and tin roof blown off in this video were 1 block from my house:
https://www.wdsu.com/article/storm-damage-reported-in-new-orleans-wednesday-morning/36405138#
[2021-05-13 04:27:22]
[Robert Garry]
"Oh, David got specific - let's crush their arguments..." Yeah the crushing will happen and the signers will regret
piling on with Alina et al.
[2021-05-13 04:36:35]
[Robert Garry]
Will have to respond to Relman at some level - you know - just to be courteous. The journos are all over this - so
thta's another place to engage. I was working - off line as it were - on some "talking points." As @Kristian Andersen
said "harsh.' or maybe not harsh enough to meet the level of nonsense. Borrowed liberally from channel: The letter
in Science completely misrepresents the outcomes of the WHO report.
The letter is half right: No data or other evidence (clear or otherwise) has emerged in support of the Lab Leak theory.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/792
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:08241 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 791–792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08242 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08243 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08244 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08245 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08246 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08247 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08248 | 2021-05-12 | chat message | 792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08249 | 2021-05-13 | chat message | 792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08250 | 2021-05-13 | chat message | 792 |
| slack_pm:msg:08251 | 2021-05-13 | chat message | 792–793 |