Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1104 [SLACK_001318] · slack_pm:msg:11508

Date: 2022-04-08 07:56
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

The question is, did BA.2 require previous peak of BA.1 to make a second peak? Obviously it would still be able tocreate a first peak in countries where it was the first Omicron.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-04-08 07:23 Andrew Rambaut open

perhaps we are all fucked again
2022-04-08 07:24 Andrew Rambaut open

There are details in the UKHSA tech briefing today
2022-04-08 07:24 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm pretty darn convinced BA.1 infection leads to pretty crappy immunity so a slight advantage in evasion while maintaining R0, well...
2022-04-08 07:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Pretty sure that's what BA.2 did as well (while being even more transmissible - which is unreal!)
2022-04-08 07:56 Andrew Rambaut

The question is, did BA.2 require previous peak of BA.1 to make a second peak? Obviously it would still be able tocreate a first peak in countries where it was the first Omicron.
2022-04-08 07:57 Andrew Rambaut open

The other thing I am really wondering about now is the 69/70del - it really seems to alternate in UK
2022-04-08 07:57 Andrew Rambaut open

(OK, only P=0.5^3 so far but if BA.4 takes off that would be P=0.0625
2022-04-08 07:59 Robert F. Garry open

https://twitter.com/JamesCTobias/status/1512421544198348802 Meanwhile FOIA drama continues...
2022-04-08 08:02 Andrew Rambaut open

Jeez they are going to be disappointed when they finally get these things.

Full conversation →