Chat message

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2022-01-27 14:09 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Thinking of sending this to Fox - because somebody's gotta at least get it on the record... Thoughts? ```Dear Timothy, No, I do not believe that origin theories were obscured or suppressed, although the question has become heavily politicized by lab leak proponents. I can categorically say that for the research I have been involved with, such allegations, including those recently made in a Fox New Special Report, are false. Our scientific investigations -published in scientific journals - have only been driven by scientific enquiry. Any suggestions to the contrary are false. The events you describe date back to the Trump White House, and it is public knowledge that the question of origin was taken up by the White House Office and Science Technology Policy, immediately following early discussions:https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2020/02/national-academies-provide-rapid-response-to-white-house-on-coronavirus-data-needs#As was the case in early 2020, available evidence point strongly towards a natural emergence of SARS-CoV-2, ashas been the case for other pandemics. Best, Kristian```
2. 2022-01-27 14:12 Robert F. Garry open
   Fauci and Collins made zero edits to out papers - the CREID Grant was written, reviewed and scored prior to the Feb 1 conf call.
3. 2022-01-27 14:15 Edward C. Holmes open
   No harm in doing so but it will have zero impact I think.
4. 2022-01-27 14:20 Andrew Rambaut open
   @Kristian Andersen Yeah - I agree with that. Will leave DQ's timeline as it is.
5. 2022-01-27 14:20 Kristian G. Andersen
   A few edits. I agree - unlikely to have impact, but need it on the record - and I can't see how it would cause additional harm (which would be the reason to _not_ email them back). ```Dear Timothy,No, I do not believe that origin theories were obscured or suppressed, although the question has become heavilypoliticized by lab leak proponents. I can categorically say that for the research I have been involved with, such allegations, including those recently made in a Fox New Special Report, are false. E.g., your report suggested that Drs. Collins and Fauci made edits to our paper - that is false. Your report also suggested we received a grant as a"quid pro quo" - that is also false (and shows a complete lack of understanding of how NIH grants are funded). Further, the grant in question was written, scored, reviewed, and ranked for funding in 2019 - prior to the pandemic. Our scientific investigations - published in peer-reviewed scientific journals - have only been driven by scientificenquiry. Any suggestions to the contrary are false. The events you describe date back to the Trump (not Biden) White House, and it is public knowledge that the question of origin was taken up by the White House Office and Science Technology Policy, immediately following early discussions:https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2020/02/national-academies-provide-rapid-response-to-white-house-on-coronavirus-data-needs#As was the case in early 2020, available evidence point strongly towards a natural emergence of SARS-CoV-2, ashas been the case for other pandemics. We are continuing our research and have several additional scientific studies forthcoming.Best, Kristian```

Full conversation →