Slack / Private Message Drop — page 1081
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001295
← p.1080 p.1082 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[Kristian Andersen]
A few edits. I agree - unlikely to have impact, but need it on the record - and I can't see how it would cause additional
harm (which would be the reason to _not_ email them back).
```Dear Timothy,
No, I do not believe that origin theories were obscured or suppressed, although the question has become heavily
politicized by lab leak proponents. I can categorically say that for the research I have been involved with, such
allegations, including those recently made in a Fox New Special Report, are false. E.g., your report suggested that
Drs. Collins and Fauci made edits to our paper - that is false. Your report also suggested we received a grant as a
"quid pro quo" - that is also false (and shows a complete lack of understanding of how NIH grants are funded).
Further, the grant in question was written, scored, reviewed, and ranked for funding in 2019 - prior to the pandemic.
Our scientific investigations - published in peer-reviewed scientific journals - have only been driven by scientific
enquiry. Any suggestions to the contrary are false.
The events you describe date back to the Trump (not Biden) White House, and it is public knowledge that the
question of origin was taken up by the White House Office and Science Technology Policy, immediately following
early discussions:
https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2020/02/national-academies-provide-rapid-response-to-white-house-on-c
oronavirus-data-needs#
As was the case in early 2020, available evidence point strongly towards a natural emergence of SARS-CoV-2, as
has been the case for other pandemics. We are continuing our research and have several additional scientific
studies forthcoming.
Best,
Kristian```
[2022-01-27 17:32:35]
[Robert Garry]
> Yeah @Eddie Holmes like the: "5. I'll not answer any of your questions if your curiosity is based on the
conspiracy of "man made or lab leak of SARS-CoV-2" or some non-sense questions based on your suspicion. No
trust, no conversation."
[2022-01-27 17:48:50]
[Eddie Holmes]
I enjoyed that one. That Cleary is a total wanker. I responded to an email by him at some point (I forget when) and
he posted it straight on Twitter.
[2022-01-27 17:56:20]
[Kristian Andersen]
Blocked him a looooooon time ago on Twitter.
[2022-01-28 04:44:51]
[Robert Garry]
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6293888614001#sp=show-clips
[2022-01-28 18:09:52]
[Kristian Andersen]
Well, at least that Fox guy quoted me fairly...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/american-scientists-downplayed-covid-19-lab-leak-theory-private-emails [shared
file(s): Screen Shot 2022-01-28 at 18.09.12.png]
[2022-01-28 18:53:53]
[Eddie Holmes]
Small win.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/1081
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:11257 | 2022-01-27 | chat message | 1080–1081 |
| slack_pm:msg:11258 | 2022-01-27 | chat message | 1081 |
| slack_pm:msg:11259 | 2022-01-27 | chat message | 1081 |
| slack_pm:msg:11260 | 2022-01-27 | chat message | 1081 |
| slack_pm:msg:11261 | 2022-01-28 | chat message | 1081 |
| slack_pm:msg:11262 | 2022-01-28 | chat message | 1081 |
| slack_pm:msg:11263 | 2022-01-28 | chat message | 1081 |