Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.966 [SLACK_001180] · slack_pm:msg:10061

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

But they most comment otherwise they shouldn't be an author and that would give us grief

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-28 15:01 Edward C. Holmes open

Not a huge number. People who will contribute. See other channel.
2021-06-28 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, agreed - let's get some big hitters / CoV folks, but other than that, keep it simple. Mike would be good so wehave some cross-fertilization.
2021-06-28 15:02 Andrew Rambaut open

But we don't want them actually to contribute - or we will get in the editing mess again.
2021-06-28 15:02 Andrew Rambaut open

Could do with some epidemiology and some ecology
2021-06-28 15:02 Edward C. Holmes

But they most comment otherwise they shouldn't be an author and that would give us grief
2021-06-28 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm wondering if we should consider Pamela Bjorkman too - big name and she's not happy with her Science letter
2021-06-28 15:03 Andrew Rambaut open

Make it as broad as possible - not just virologists worried about being allowed to create frankenstein viruses.
2021-06-28 15:04 Andrew Rambaut open

Yes - we need documented evidence of a suggested edit.
2021-06-28 15:04 Edward C. Holmes open

Exactly!