COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.966 [SLACK_001180] · slack_pm:msg:10062

Page text: p.966 · original PDF

Date
2021-06-28 15:02
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I'm wondering if we should consider Pamela Bjorkman too - big name and she's not happy with her Science letter

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-06-28 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, agreed - let's get some big hitters / CoV folks, but other than that, keep it simple. Mike would be good so wehave some cross-fertilization.
  2. 2021-06-28 15:02 Andrew Rambaut open
    But we don't want them actually to contribute - or we will get in the editing mess again.
  3. 2021-06-28 15:02 Andrew Rambaut open
    Could do with some epidemiology and some ecology
  4. 2021-06-28 15:02 Edward C. Holmes open
    But they most comment otherwise they shouldn't be an author and that would give us grief
  5. 2021-06-28 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen
    I'm wondering if we should consider Pamela Bjorkman too - big name and she's not happy with her Science letter
  6. 2021-06-28 15:03 Andrew Rambaut open
    Make it as broad as possible - not just virologists worried about being allowed to create frankenstein viruses.
  7. 2021-06-28 15:04 Andrew Rambaut open
    Yes - we need documented evidence of a suggested edit.
  8. 2021-06-28 15:04 Edward C. Holmes open
    Exactly!
  9. 2021-06-28 15:11 Andrew Rambaut open
    Need to keep gender balance and non-US/UK angle

Full conversation →