COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.965-966 [SLACK_001179] · slack_pm:msg:10060

Page text: p.965, p.966 · original PDF

Date
2021-06-28 15:02
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Could do with some epidemiology and some ecology

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-06-28 15:00 Andrew Rambaut open
    How many extra authors do we want? Only big hitters? Broad range of fields?
  2. 2021-06-28 15:01 Edward C. Holmes open
    Not a huge number. People who will contribute. See other channel.
  3. 2021-06-28 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, agreed - let's get some big hitters / CoV folks, but other than that, keep it simple. Mike would be good so wehave some cross-fertilization.
  4. 2021-06-28 15:02 Andrew Rambaut open
    But we don't want them actually to contribute - or we will get in the editing mess again.
  5. 2021-06-28 15:02 Andrew Rambaut
    Could do with some epidemiology and some ecology
  6. 2021-06-28 15:02 Edward C. Holmes open
    But they most comment otherwise they shouldn't be an author and that would give us grief
  7. 2021-06-28 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I'm wondering if we should consider Pamela Bjorkman too - big name and she's not happy with her Science letter
  8. 2021-06-28 15:03 Andrew Rambaut open
    Make it as broad as possible - not just virologists worried about being allowed to create frankenstein viruses.
  9. 2021-06-28 15:04 Andrew Rambaut open
    Yes - we need documented evidence of a suggested edit.

Full conversation →