Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.966 [SLACK_001180] · slack_pm:msg:10063

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Make it as broad as possible - not just virologists worried about being allowed to create frankenstein viruses.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-28 15:02 Andrew Rambaut open

But we don't want them actually to contribute - or we will get in the editing mess again.
2021-06-28 15:02 Andrew Rambaut open

Could do with some epidemiology and some ecology
2021-06-28 15:02 Edward C. Holmes open

But they most comment otherwise they shouldn't be an author and that would give us grief
2021-06-28 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm wondering if we should consider Pamela Bjorkman too - big name and she's not happy with her Science letter
2021-06-28 15:03 Andrew Rambaut

Make it as broad as possible - not just virologists worried about being allowed to create frankenstein viruses.
2021-06-28 15:04 Andrew Rambaut open

Yes - we need documented evidence of a suggested edit.
2021-06-28 15:04 Edward C. Holmes open

Exactly!
2021-06-28 15:11 Andrew Rambaut open

Need to keep gender balance and non-US/UK angle
2021-06-28 15:12 Andrew Rambaut open

Let's try and vet the names before Angie and Stephen invite every virologist they ever had a drink with