Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.919 [SLACK_001133] · slack_pm:msg:09539

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-22 at 7.33.29 am.png

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-04 14:11 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, of course it will. He even answered his own question by mentioned the pangolin papers which she claims are dodgy. I'm not answering this garbage.
2021-06-04 14:12 Robert F. Garry open

Third choice tell him you will talk to him off the record on background then send him all the Alina Bullshit. It would bemy pleasure to help you compile it.
2021-06-04 14:20 Robert F. Garry open

Not answering probably the best choice of the three - let him stew. He really doesn't have a story re Eddie Holmes UNLESS Eddie Holmes responds.
2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open

When he wrote to me previously I said I was not going to talk to him because Rowan was giving oxygen to someone who has questioned my research integrity. I stand by that. I'm just not going to reply as anything is oxygen to them. When I wrote to the Broad I included these 3 tweets which are pretty clear:
2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes

shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-22 at 7.33.29 am.png
2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): image (1).png
2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): Another image.png
2021-06-04 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open

I am an author of these papers and she directly mentions 'severe research integrity'.
2021-06-04 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open

However, Bob, if you have other good examples they would be great to have for the future.