Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-06-04 14:09 Kristian G. Andersen open
   No point... Also, Antonio is a giant idiot and works closely with Rowan Jacobsen, so I'm sure his story about Alina is going to bea love story about how she single handedly stood firm against conspiring virologists.
2. 2021-06-04 14:10 Robert F. Garry open
   Hobsen's choice. Answer and you get sucked into the Alina BS and are still at the mercy of the reporter. Don't answer and you get sucked into the Alina BS and are still at the mercy of the reporter.
3. 2021-06-04 14:11 Edward C. Holmes open
   Yes, of course it will. He even answered his own question by mentioned the pangolin papers which she claims are dodgy. I'm not answering this garbage.
4. 2021-06-04 14:12 Robert F. Garry open
   Third choice tell him you will talk to him off the record on background then send him all the Alina Bullshit. It would bemy pleasure to help you compile it.
5. 2021-06-04 14:20 Robert F. Garry
   Not answering probably the best choice of the three - let him stew. He really doesn't have a story re Eddie Holmes UNLESS Eddie Holmes responds.
6. 2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open
   When he wrote to me previously I said I was not going to talk to him because Rowan was giving oxygen to someone who has questioned my research integrity. I stand by that. I'm just not going to reply as anything is oxygen to them. When I wrote to the Broad I included these 3 tweets which are pretty clear:
7. 2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open
   shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-22 at 7.33.29 am.png
8. 2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open
   shared file(s): image (1).png
9. 2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open
   shared file(s): Another image.png

Full conversation →