Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.919 [SLACK_001133] · slack_pm:msg:09542

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I am an author of these papers and she directly mentions 'severe research integrity'.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open

When he wrote to me previously I said I was not going to talk to him because Rowan was giving oxygen to someone who has questioned my research integrity. I stand by that. I'm just not going to reply as anything is oxygen to them. When I wrote to the Broad I included these 3 tweets which are pretty clear:
2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-22 at 7.33.29 am.png
2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): image (1).png
2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): Another image.png
2021-06-04 14:37 Edward C. Holmes

I am an author of these papers and she directly mentions 'severe research integrity'.
2021-06-04 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open

However, Bob, if you have other good examples they would be great to have for the future.
2021-06-04 15:06 Robert F. Garry open

I'll look -those are the most important...
2021-06-04 15:21 Robert F. Garry open

You got the majors - here are a few others parked here for context. Angie may have some more it seems. [shared file(s): image.png, image.png, image.png, image.png, image.png]
2021-06-04 15:21 Edward C. Holmes open

She also asked Nick Loman on Twitter if I was an original author on the Nature paper. She's bloody evil.