A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Yup, and you know what, that allows us to actually get to the bottom of how things work and not just rely on gutreactions.
-
Does he seriously want to know how she has questioned my research integrity?! [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-05 at 7.03.07 am.png]
-
No point... Also, Antonio is a giant idiot and works closely with Rowan Jacobsen, so I'm sure his story about Alina is going to bea love story about how she single handedly stood firm against conspiring virologists.
-
Hobsen's choice. Answer and you get sucked into the Alina BS and are still at the mercy of the reporter. Don't answer and you get sucked into the Alina BS and are still at the mercy of the reporter.
-
2021-06-04 14:11
Edward C. Holmes
Yes, of course it will. He even answered his own question by mentioned the pangolin papers which she claims are dodgy. I'm not answering this garbage.
-
Third choice tell him you will talk to him off the record on background then send him all the Alina Bullshit. It would bemy pleasure to help you compile it.
-
Not answering probably the best choice of the three - let him stew. He really doesn't have a story re Eddie Holmes UNLESS Eddie Holmes responds.
-
When he wrote to me previously I said I was not going to talk to him because Rowan was giving oxygen to someone who has questioned my research integrity. I stand by that. I'm just not going to reply as anything is oxygen to them. When I wrote to the Broad I included these 3 tweets which are pretty clear:
-
shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-22 at 7.33.29 am.png