Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-06-04 13:50 Kristian G. Andersen open
   I have a really hard time believing WIV had them - but I can totally believe the wildlife rescue center might have. Itwould provide SUCH an easy path - dead pangolin no good, let's sell dead pangolin to make good money > helloCOVID-19.
2. 2021-06-04 13:51 Robert F. Garry open
   FCS is an Umbrella Man. Real scientists accumulate data - analysis - consider options - test hypotheses.
3. 2021-06-04 13:52 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Yup, and you know what, that allows us to actually get to the bottom of how things work and not just rely on gutreactions.
4. 2021-06-04 14:04 Edward C. Holmes open
   Does he seriously want to know how she has questioned my research integrity?! [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-05 at 7.03.07 am.png]
5. 2021-06-04 14:09 Kristian G. Andersen
   No point... Also, Antonio is a giant idiot and works closely with Rowan Jacobsen, so I'm sure his story about Alina is going to bea love story about how she single handedly stood firm against conspiring virologists.
6. 2021-06-04 14:10 Robert F. Garry open
   Hobsen's choice. Answer and you get sucked into the Alina BS and are still at the mercy of the reporter. Don't answer and you get sucked into the Alina BS and are still at the mercy of the reporter.
7. 2021-06-04 14:11 Edward C. Holmes open
   Yes, of course it will. He even answered his own question by mentioned the pangolin papers which she claims are dodgy. I'm not answering this garbage.
8. 2021-06-04 14:12 Robert F. Garry open
   Third choice tell him you will talk to him off the record on background then send him all the Alina Bullshit. It would bemy pleasure to help you compile it.
9. 2021-06-04 14:20 Robert F. Garry open
   Not answering probably the best choice of the three - let him stew. He really doesn't have a story re Eddie Holmes UNLESS Eddie Holmes responds.

Full conversation →