COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.884 [SLACK_001098] · slack_pm:msg:09163

Page text: p.884 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-27 14:43
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

And some cover-up it would need to be. If they had 3 serious cases in the 2nd week of Nov then there would be 10sof less serious cases dating back into October. Lots is the must have known and obviously Shi. That's a lot of peopleto keep quiet, inc. all those their lab results are negative.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-27 14:24 Robert F. Garry open
    This actually makes no sense - if both arguments are "speculative," then why the hell did they publish the Bloomshit, which they just called speculative?
  2. 2021-05-27 14:26 Robert F. Garry open
    Yeah - good point Andrew.
  3. 2021-05-27 14:30 Robert F. Garry open
    And to be clear, the Bloomshit letter is speculating that Shi et al are involved in a massive conspiracy and cover-up.
  4. 2021-05-27 14:39 Kristian G. Andersen open
    That's hilarious. From a journal called "Science".
  5. 2021-05-27 14:43 Edward C. Holmes
    And some cover-up it would need to be. If they had 3 serious cases in the 2nd week of Nov then there would be 10sof less serious cases dating back into October. Lots is the must have known and obviously Shi. That's a lot of peopleto keep quiet, inc. all those their lab results are negative.
  6. 2021-05-27 14:46 Robert F. Garry open
    After the big can of whoopass Amy M unloaded on them last night I think that the Science Editors are likely sitting inthe corner licking their wounds.
  7. 2021-05-27 14:47 Kristian G. Andersen open
    ... and one additional thing to that point that Joel brought up earlier today - if WIV really had three people who endedup in the hospital with COVID, a TON of people would have had to have gotten infected before that wouldstatistically be plausible given hospitalization rates.
  8. 2021-05-27 14:49 Edward C. Holmes open
    Yes, that's my point as well.
  9. 2021-05-27 14:50 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Well, of course it is - only read the first part :wink:

Full conversation →