Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-05-27 14:26 Robert F. Garry open
   Yeah - good point Andrew.
2. 2021-05-27 14:30 Robert F. Garry open
   And to be clear, the Bloomshit letter is speculating that Shi et al are involved in a massive conspiracy and cover-up.
3. 2021-05-27 14:39 Kristian G. Andersen open
   That's hilarious. From a journal called "Science".
4. 2021-05-27 14:43 Edward C. Holmes open
   And some cover-up it would need to be. If they had 3 serious cases in the 2nd week of Nov then there would be 10sof less serious cases dating back into October. Lots is the must have known and obviously Shi. That's a lot of peopleto keep quiet, inc. all those their lab results are negative.
5. 2021-05-27 14:46 Robert F. Garry
   After the big can of whoopass Amy M unloaded on them last night I think that the Science Editors are likely sitting inthe corner licking their wounds.
6. 2021-05-27 14:47 Kristian G. Andersen open
   ... and one additional thing to that point that Joel brought up earlier today - if WIV really had three people who endedup in the hospital with COVID, a TON of people would have had to have gotten infected before that wouldstatistically be plausible given hospitalization rates.
7. 2021-05-27 14:49 Edward C. Holmes open
   Yes, that's my point as well.
8. 2021-05-27 14:50 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Well, of course it is - only read the first part :wink:
9. 2021-05-27 14:52 Edward C. Holmes open
   Which also means that they started the cover-up long before this outbreak became serious

Full conversation →