Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-05-19 14:29 Edward C. Holmes open
   @Eddie Holmes At least some of the comments are reasonable. Molecular Biologist is spot on.
2. 2021-05-19 14:31 Andrew Rambaut open
   I'm on that paper and did most of the phylogenetic...
3. 2021-05-19 14:34 Robert F. Garry open
   Noticed that and guessed that - It's a really important piece of work. Trying to figure out how best to do it justice inthe Commentary.
4. 2021-05-19 14:34 Kristian G. Andersen open
   @Eddie Holmes He's basically reiterating what we said in our paper - but people apparently still don't get it.
5. 2021-05-19 14:35 Kristian G. Andersen
   @Eddie Holmes Why Derek felt the need to write this, I don't know. It's as if anybody with a science background - orno science background - feels qualified to comment on what is an extremely complex issue. Again, these people just can't get past the fact it started in Wuhan.
6. 2021-05-19 14:36 Kristian G. Andersen open
   @Eddie Holmes (but they apparently don't have any issues with a researcher magically picking up the next pandemic virus from a bat butt. Okay, then - A+ for stats).
7. 2021-05-19 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open
   @Eddie Holmes And shows why the conspiracy theorists are so keen to attack the pangolin data
8. 2021-05-19 14:38 Kristian G. Andersen open
   @Eddie Holmes It's a really inconvenient piece of evidence. It's the one thing that solidified my belief.
9. 2021-05-19 14:38 Edward C. Holmes open
   @Eddie Holmes Me too

Full conversation →