Chat message

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-05-19 12:01 Robert F. Garry open
   Off topic again, but Nature asked me to write a commentary on the paper describing the sequences from this year'sGuinea Ebola outbreak. It's comes heavily down that this is re-emergence. Given A82V is in the sequences and thatA82V arose somewhere between the initial spillover and the Gire,Andersen2014 sequences that's probably a good bet. I just want to make sure I'm not missing nuaunces (like a long-lived bat) discussed above in channel.
2. 2021-05-19 12:19 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Yes, almost certainly re-emergence and especially A82V gives it away - and, of course, the clock. There _are_ other explanations that can't be disproven, however, IMO persistence + re-emergence provide a much more likely explanation (we have seen all the pieces already - we just need to accept 500 days can also be five years. I have noproblem with that). Also - remember to mention the solution being vaccination as you suggested - will help combatstigma.
3. 2021-05-19 13:02 Robert F. Garry open
   Good to hear. I will endeavor not to get too far out over my skis on the phylogeny. Yes - the stigma issue was well-discussed and vaccination might be key. I'm talking to Merck (one of my students (Tom Voss is there - Jessicawas also at Merck but moved a few weeks ago to J&J) about - at least - providing some vaccine to our Ebola survivor cohort in SL to test this.
4. 2021-05-19 13:28 Kristian G. Andersen open
   @Eddie Holmes > I think the laws of free speech allow me to call a bunch of conspiracy theorists conspiracy theorists. I believe you're indeed right. Bloomshitters too.
5. 2021-05-19 13:38 Robert F. Garry
   @Eddie Holmes https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2021/05/19/coronavirus-origins It's remarkable to me how "rationale people" writing about Bloomshit avoid the obvious --- if you think that WIV had SC2 or something very close and didn't tell anyone HOW in the hell is this _not_ a conspiracy theory. Won't responsible commentary orjournalism maybe mention that?
6. 2021-05-19 14:29 Edward C. Holmes open
   @Eddie Holmes At least some of the comments are reasonable. Molecular Biologist is spot on.
7. 2021-05-19 14:31 Andrew Rambaut open
   I'm on that paper and did most of the phylogenetic...
8. 2021-05-19 14:34 Robert F. Garry open
   Noticed that and guessed that - It's a really important piece of work. Trying to figure out how best to do it justice inthe Commentary.
9. 2021-05-19 14:34 Kristian G. Andersen open
   @Eddie Holmes He's basically reiterating what we said in our paper - but people apparently still don't get it.

Full conversation →