Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.792 [SLACK_001006] · slack_pm:msg:08243

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Andrew - any chance you can please write a point about the likelihood? Basically what you already have but in a few sentences?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-12 23:24 Andrew Rambaut open

> To call this scenario a "conspiracy theory" is inappropriate and unfair to everyone involved.
2021-05-12 23:25 Edward C. Holmes open

Send them this to explain the point: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MMiKyfd6hA0
2021-05-12 23:26 Andrew Rambaut open

> I would never hang my hat on any of it. But I would send a letter to Science
2021-05-12 23:30 Edward C. Holmes open

False equivalence is that the gamey tasting menu is full of bloody viruses (although we can't use this). Some ofthese animals were sick and sold.
2021-05-12 23:30 Kristian G. Andersen

Andrew - any chance you can please write a point about the likelihood? Basically what you already have but in a few sentences?
2021-05-12 23:30 Kristian G. Andersen open

> False equivalence is that the gamey tasting menu is full of bloody viruses (although we can't use this). Some ofthese animals were sick and sold.I honestly don't understand we aren't all already dead - it's a fucking miracle.
2021-05-12 23:32 Edward C. Holmes open

5. Virus is adapted to spread in multiple hosts (e.g. mink). 6. Same RBD found in pangolins so it is in nature.
2021-05-12 23:33 Kristian G. Andersen open

"No evidence either way". Sure. Until you think about it.
2021-05-12 23:35 Kristian G. Andersen open

Alright, off to bed for me - I'll pick it up again tomorrow (unless somebody wants to answer before - I might waste too much time again... :wink: . :beer: