Chat message

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-05-12 23:26 Andrew Rambaut open
   > I would never hang my hat on any of it. But I would send a letter to Science
2. 2021-05-12 23:30 Edward C. Holmes open
   False equivalence is that the gamey tasting menu is full of bloody viruses (although we can't use this). Some ofthese animals were sick and sold.
3. 2021-05-12 23:30 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Andrew - any chance you can please write a point about the likelihood? Basically what you already have but in a few sentences?
4. 2021-05-12 23:30 Kristian G. Andersen open
   > False equivalence is that the gamey tasting menu is full of bloody viruses (although we can't use this). Some ofthese animals were sick and sold.I honestly don't understand we aren't all already dead - it's a fucking miracle.
5. 2021-05-12 23:32 Edward C. Holmes
   5. Virus is adapted to spread in multiple hosts (e.g. mink). 6. Same RBD found in pangolins so it is in nature.
6. 2021-05-12 23:33 Kristian G. Andersen open
   "No evidence either way". Sure. Until you think about it.
7. 2021-05-12 23:35 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Alright, off to bed for me - I'll pick it up again tomorrow (unless somebody wants to answer before - I might waste too much time again... :wink: . :beer:
8. 2021-05-12 23:37 Edward C. Holmes open
   Yes, get some rest

Full conversation →