Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.577 [SLACK_000791] · slack_pm:msg:06025

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, Bob, but these are Chinese scientists - they're clueless, you know.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-08 15:07 Kristian G. Andersen open

I think they assume - 10,000 samples = 10,000 chances for SC2 to hop out of a tube. Nope.
2021-03-08 15:08 Robert F. Garry open

@Andrew Rambaut Hammer hits nail!
2021-03-08 15:09 Kristian G. Andersen open

There's virtually _zero_ chance a virus could leak out of a tube - if they culture to high titers, sure - but again, in most circumstances that's not going to be possible because it's so hard to grow anything out of a primary sample.
2021-03-08 15:11 Robert F. Garry open

That and they should be doing it with at least an N95 and better yet a PAPR. Damn sure have my ppl in a PAPR/class 2 hood if they are trying to grow virus in large amts.
2021-03-08 15:12 Kristian G. Andersen

Yes, Bob, but these are Chinese scientists - they're clueless, you know.
2021-03-08 15:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

:face_with_rolling_eyes:
2021-03-08 15:13 Robert F. Garry open

Indeed but they're miles ahead of The Parisites(R) , who are so out of their depth it is really NOT at all funny.
2021-03-08 15:54 Edward C. Holmes open

And why would they possibly be culturing a random bat virus which was not associated with the miners outbreak (because they published a partial sequence of RaT13 years ago)?
2021-03-08 16:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

BECAUSE Eddie! Just Because!!!