Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.577 [SLACK_000791] · slack_pm:msg:06028

Date: 2021-03-08 15:54
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes
Topics: Intelligence community assessments

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

And why would they possibly be culturing a random bat virus which was not associated with the miners outbreak (because they published a partial sequence of RaT13 years ago)?

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
And why would they possibly be culturing a random bat virus which was not associated with the miners outbreak (because they published a partial sequence of RaT13 years ago)?	needs context	uncertain explicit hedge	questions

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

And why would they possibly be culturing a random bat virus which was not associated with the miners outbreak (because they published a partial sequence of RaT13 years ago)?

needs context

uncertain explicit hedge

questions

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-08 15:11 Robert F. Garry open

That and they should be doing it with at least an N95 and better yet a PAPR. Damn sure have my ppl in a PAPR/class 2 hood if they are trying to grow virus in large amts.
2021-03-08 15:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yes, Bob, but these are Chinese scientists - they're clueless, you know.
2021-03-08 15:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

:face_with_rolling_eyes:
2021-03-08 15:13 Robert F. Garry open

Indeed but they're miles ahead of The Parisites(R) , who are so out of their depth it is really NOT at all funny.
2021-03-08 15:54 Edward C. Holmes

And why would they possibly be culturing a random bat virus which was not associated with the miners outbreak (because they published a partial sequence of RaT13 years ago)?
2021-03-08 16:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

BECAUSE Eddie! Just Because!!!
2021-03-08 16:05 Edward C. Holmes open

Fuck, you're right.

Full conversation →