Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.560 [SLACK_000774] · slack_pm:msg:05846

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

If they wanted to avoid these issues they would removed all the personal stuff.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-01 15:13 Edward C. Holmes open

The reaction to their paper is EXACTLY what I told them would happen. They were warned!!
2021-03-01 15:23 Andrew Rambaut open

There we go. As predicted: [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-03-01 15:23 Andrew Rambaut open

"exactly what we were trying to avoid"
2021-03-01 15:27 Edward C. Holmes open

That's total BS!!! You saw my emails.
2021-03-01 15:31 Edward C. Holmes

If they wanted to avoid these issues they would removed all the personal stuff.
2021-03-01 15:32 Kristian G. Andersen open

And this is directly insulting to me - this isn't about fucking me man! [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-01 at15.31.21.png]
2021-03-01 15:37 Edward C. Holmes open

I've just written to Rob.
2021-03-01 15:40 Robert F. Garry open

Jeez - just got back from a long lecture - may have started out with good intentions, but wow so off base. "And good choice taking yourself off the paper" INDEED! Safe to say Rob didn't get the point....
2021-03-01 15:46 Andrew Rambaut open

Just written to Emma. Don't want to pile on these people - it is Nick and Christophe who should be responsible.