Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.560 [SLACK_000774] · slack_pm:msg:05844

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

"exactly what we were trying to avoid"

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-01 15:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

One very important question the authors need to ask themselves - would they have been authors if this had been for, say, Nature Microbiology and not Nature?
2021-03-01 15:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

Charles trying to convince me to stay on his paper made it very clear that he had been talking directly to NEJM and Cell and that they both wanted it - this should _never_ be a consideration when it comes to sloppy science. Orwhatever-the-fuck this is. Just horrible.
2021-03-01 15:13 Edward C. Holmes open

The reaction to their paper is EXACTLY what I told them would happen. They were warned!!
2021-03-01 15:23 Andrew Rambaut open

There we go. As predicted: [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-03-01 15:23 Andrew Rambaut

"exactly what we were trying to avoid"
2021-03-01 15:27 Edward C. Holmes open

That's total BS!!! You saw my emails.
2021-03-01 15:31 Edward C. Holmes open

If they wanted to avoid these issues they would removed all the personal stuff.
2021-03-01 15:32 Kristian G. Andersen open

And this is directly insulting to me - this isn't about fucking me man! [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-01 at15.31.21.png]
2021-03-01 15:37 Edward C. Holmes open

I've just written to Rob.