Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.560 [SLACK_000774] · slack_pm:msg:05849

Date: 2021-03-01 15:40
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Jeez - just got back from a long lecture - may have started out with good intentions, but wow so off base. "And good choice taking yourself off the paper" INDEED! Safe to say Rob didn't get the point....

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-01 15:27 Edward C. Holmes open

That's total BS!!! You saw my emails.
2021-03-01 15:31 Edward C. Holmes open

If they wanted to avoid these issues they would removed all the personal stuff.
2021-03-01 15:32 Kristian G. Andersen open

And this is directly insulting to me - this isn't about fucking me man! [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-01 at15.31.21.png]
2021-03-01 15:37 Edward C. Holmes open

I've just written to Rob.
2021-03-01 15:40 Robert F. Garry

Jeez - just got back from a long lecture - may have started out with good intentions, but wow so off base. "And good choice taking yourself off the paper" INDEED! Safe to say Rob didn't get the point....
2021-03-01 15:46 Andrew Rambaut open

Just written to Emma. Don't want to pile on these people - it is Nick and Christophe who should be responsible.
2021-03-01 15:50 Edward C. Holmes open

Nick & Christophe are indeed the main culprits although Emma did nothing to change what was written about her.
2021-03-01 15:54 Edward C. Holmes open

And Rob's Twitter response is just untrue. We even had a bloody email chat about these concerns!!

Full conversation →