Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.329 [SLACK_000543] · slack_pm:msg:03462

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

We don't see N501Y in our chronic patient - big difference, no treatment in that person.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-12-20 13:20 Andrew Rambaut open

Is that the NEJM case?
2020-12-20 13:20 Andrew Rambaut open

Seems to be an increasing number over time.
2020-12-20 13:20 Kristian G. Andersen open

Lemme check - don't think so
2020-12-20 13:21 Kristian G. Andersen open

Actually, probably is... https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2031364
2020-12-20 13:22 Kristian G. Andersen

We don't see N501Y in our chronic patient - big difference, no treatment in that person.
2020-12-20 13:24 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut - question here, as I see this coming up in many many news articles. Do folks understand that there are two separate concerns here? (1) Increased transmission, possibly due to N501Y, and (2) Concerns about 'immunity' due to the mutations and deletions on the same haplotype? I see many people commenting that "we shouldn't expect SARS-CoV-2 to evolve towards immune evasion", but the problem here is that what we're seeing here isn't 'normal' SARS-CoV-2 evolution - it's a different process and it may _specifically_ be related to immune evasion. Can't assume our normal priors are appropriate here.
2020-12-20 13:26 Andrew Rambaut open

I have brought this up a few times but I still don't think people get it.
2020-12-20 13:26 Andrew Rambaut open

I am leaving it until the lab work is done.
2020-12-20 13:27 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, same here - until I see data, no point in speculating, however, let's not trust our priors 100%