COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.329 [SLACK_000543] · slack_pm:msg:03460

Page text: p.329 · original PDF

Date
2020-12-20 13:20
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Lemme check - don't think so

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-12-20 13:20 Andrew Rambaut open
    Yes all from the same dead 45 year old man
  2. 2020-12-20 13:20 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Holy moly - a lot of mutations there...
  3. 2020-12-20 13:20 Andrew Rambaut open
    Is that the NEJM case?
  4. 2020-12-20 13:20 Andrew Rambaut open
    Seems to be an increasing number over time.
  5. 2020-12-20 13:20 Kristian G. Andersen
    Lemme check - don't think so
  6. 2020-12-20 13:21 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Actually, probably is... https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2031364
  7. 2020-12-20 13:22 Kristian G. Andersen open
    We don't see N501Y in our chronic patient - big difference, no treatment in that person.
  8. 2020-12-20 13:24 Kristian G. Andersen open
    @Andrew Rambaut - question here, as I see this coming up in many many news articles. Do folks understand that there are two separate concerns here? (1) Increased transmission, possibly due to N501Y, and (2) Concerns about 'immunity' due to the mutations and deletions on the same haplotype? I see many people commenting that "we shouldn't expect SARS-CoV-2 to evolve towards immune evasion", but the problem here is that what we're seeing here isn't 'normal' SARS-CoV-2 evolution - it's a different process and it may _specifically_ be related to immune evasion. Can't assume our normal priors are appropriate here.
  9. 2020-12-20 13:26 Andrew Rambaut open
    I have brought this up a few times but I still don't think people get it.

Full conversation →