Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.296 [SLACK_000510] · slack_pm:msg:03084

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Just compared WA1 to Hu-1 and RaTG13. Only three differences between the two, all of them ancestral in WA1 - not Hu-1.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-12-06 09:33 Kristian G. Andersen open

Here's the NYT article about China's cover up - it's a very good one, but nothing new: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/06/world/asia/china-covid-origin-falsehoods.html?action=click&module=News&pgtype=Homepage
2020-12-06 09:52 Andrew Rambaut open

I was just taking a closer look at the rooting of the pandemic. Our lineage A is definitely 2 nucleotides (1 amino acid) closer to RaTG13 than lineage B (Wuhan-Hu-1). But interestingly WA1 is one nucleotide closer still (out of a1150-odd, of course). It looks like the some of lineage A had a chance reversion (synonymous). But may be the cause of mis-rooting.
2020-12-06 09:54 Kristian G. Andersen open

In what sites? Lemme check the bam file to see how confident those RaTG13 calls are in those positions
2020-12-06 09:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

There are some low-coverage regions in that genome where you have ambiguous calls
2020-12-06 10:02 Kristian G. Andersen

Just compared WA1 to Hu-1 and RaTG13. Only three differences between the two, all of them ancestral in WA1 - not Hu-1.
2020-12-06 10:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

What do you use as prototypical Lineage A?
2020-12-06 10:03 Andrew Rambaut open

WH04
2020-12-06 10:03 Kristian G. Andersen open

Lemme include that too - and I should say, all those calls are fully supported in the RaTG13 assembly, so they're good
2020-12-06 10:04 Kristian G. Andersen open

It's that midpoint root.... Some early emergence funkiness.