Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.284 · slack_pm:msg:02956

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes - I saw the Guardian article. It is good that they make it clear that this is a political angle and doesn't come from the science.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-11-28 13:53 Andrew Rambaut open

They certainly seem to be offering it to the WHO's 'origins investigation committee'.
2020-11-28 13:53 Edward C. Holmes open

Mad shit.
2020-11-28 13:53 Robert F. Garry open

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/29/a-year-after-wuhan-alarm-china-seeks-to-change-covid-origin-stor y?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
2020-11-28 13:53 Robert F. Garry open

Guardian article is OK Andrew's right: "Will be interest to see how hard this is pushed into the media - i.e. is itgovernment sponsored." It willalso be interesting to see how Trump supported media (Fox, Newsmax, OAN) handle this.
2020-11-28 13:53 Andrew Rambaut

Yes - I saw the Guardian article. It is good that they make it clear that this is a political angle and doesn't come from the science.
2020-11-28 13:53 Robert F. Garry open

Agree - The whole notion of precirculation is of course something we offered up in PO1 - who knew that would be subverted to Italy and India [or maybe other countries beginning in I]. Perhaps another paragraph or two for PO2?
2020-11-28 13:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

Is the article still up? Eddie's link doesn't work for me...