A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Based on the call I had with WHO (and I believe this preprint was part of what instigated that) I had started to get together some data to do a rebuttal. But this is way worse than I imagined. It is just waffle.
-
Will be interest to see how hard this is pushed into the media - i.e. is it government sponsored.
-
It may not be government sponsored, but the government will be delighted and I assume it's all over their state media. I'll see what has to say.
-
They certainly seem to be offering it to the WHO's 'origins investigation committee'.
-
2020-11-28 13:53
Edward C. Holmes
Mad shit.
-
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/29/a-year-after-wuhan-alarm-china-seeks-to-change-covid-origin-stor y?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
-
Guardian article is OK Andrew's right: "Will be interest to see how hard this is pushed into the media - i.e. is itgovernment sponsored." It willalso be interesting to see how Trump supported media (Fox, Newsmax, OAN) handle this.
-
Yes - I saw the Guardian article. It is good that they make it clear that this is a political angle and doesn't come from the science.
-
Agree - The whole notion of precirculation is of course something we offered up in PO1 - who knew that would be subverted to Italy and India [or maybe other countries beginning in I]. Perhaps another paragraph or two for PO2?