Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.243 [SLACK_000457] · slack_pm:msg:02533

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

But it also doesn't fit the WIV narrative as they don't do anything with the BGI.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-30 16:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, it'll be interesting to see what they say - also, this is from the paper about the metadata [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-30 at 4.08.13 PM.png]
2020-10-30 16:26 Kristian G. Andersen open

"My guess is that they were created for something else and then backfilled" Yeah, that's my suspicion too - although that _is_ a little unsual.
2020-10-30 16:28 Edward C. Holmes open

But I think the other option is even more unusual...but I'm as keen to find out as you! At the very least we need acompelling answer for the trolls who are about to descend upon us...
2020-10-30 16:30 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, once the tinfoil hats get hold of this. :boom:
2020-10-30 16:31 Edward C. Holmes

But it also doesn't fit the WIV narrative as they don't do anything with the BGI.
2020-10-30 16:33 Edward C. Holmes open

And the BGI are not even in Wuhan.
2020-10-30 16:33 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, I don't really see how any of this fits with WIV (other than it being close to PLA). It fits better with the Huanan market (since the whole "Line 2" narrative isn't all that stupid)
2020-10-30 16:34 Kristian G. Andersen open

One thing "Steve" considers a potential hypothesis here is a "vaccine challenge trial" - which isn't totally idiotic. But we'd have known about some SARS2 related virus if that were the case.
2020-10-30 16:35 Edward C. Holmes open

Raccoon dogs in the market would be so simple....yes, the vaccine trial is mad.