COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.243 [SLACK_000457] · slack_pm:msg:02529

Page text: p.243 · original PDF

Date
2020-10-30 16:25
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yeah, it'll be interesting to see what they say - also, this is from the paper about the metadata [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-30 at 4.08.13 PM.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-10-30 15:52 Kristian G. Andersen open
    He'd know what's up with that early creation date.
  2. 2020-10-30 15:54 Kristian G. Andersen open
    If you had some suspected cases of novel coronavirus, Weijun would be the kind of guy you'd contact - he's been developing diagnostics for SARS too, so would make sense. I think there's probably an earlier timeline here that they may have been obscuring a little - which, honestly, wouldn't surprise me that much.
  3. 2020-10-30 16:22 Edward C. Holmes open
    Yes, I looked at the Lancet paper straight away. I've already contacted Weifeng. If that fails I'll contact Weijun Chen.
  4. 2020-10-30 16:25 Edward C. Holmes open
    The point is who is the 'you' in your question? Who did they work for? A doctor in Wuhan? What people would do isrun the standard panel of tests and if they failed perhaps contact a sequencing company like BGI. But if that were the case why did they not submit samples until 2 weeks later? My guess is that they were created for something else and then backfilled.
  5. 2020-10-30 16:25 Kristian G. Andersen
    Yeah, it'll be interesting to see what they say - also, this is from the paper about the metadata [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-30 at 4.08.13 PM.png]
  6. 2020-10-30 16:26 Kristian G. Andersen open
    "My guess is that they were created for something else and then backfilled" Yeah, that's my suspicion too - although that _is_ a little unsual.
  7. 2020-10-30 16:28 Edward C. Holmes open
    But I think the other option is even more unusual...but I'm as keen to find out as you! At the very least we need acompelling answer for the trolls who are about to descend upon us...
  8. 2020-10-30 16:30 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, once the tinfoil hats get hold of this. :boom:
  9. 2020-10-30 16:31 Edward C. Holmes open
    But it also doesn't fit the WIV narrative as they don't do anything with the BGI.

Full conversation →