A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Yes, I looked at the Lancet paper straight away. I've already contacted Weifeng. If that fails I'll contact Weijun Chen.
-
The point is who is the 'you' in your question? Who did they work for? A doctor in Wuhan? What people would do isrun the standard panel of tests and if they failed perhaps contact a sequencing company like BGI. But if that were the case why did they not submit samples until 2 weeks later? My guess is that they were created for something else and then backfilled.
-
Yeah, it'll be interesting to see what they say - also, this is from the paper about the metadata [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-30 at 4.08.13 PM.png]
-
"My guess is that they were created for something else and then backfilled" Yeah, that's my suspicion too - although that _is_ a little unsual.
-
2020-10-30 16:28
Edward C. Holmes
But I think the other option is even more unusual...but I'm as keen to find out as you! At the very least we need acompelling answer for the trolls who are about to descend upon us...
-
Yeah, once the tinfoil hats get hold of this. :boom:
-
But it also doesn't fit the WIV narrative as they don't do anything with the BGI.
-
And the BGI are not even in Wuhan.
-
Yeah, I don't really see how any of this fits with WIV (other than it being close to PLA). It fits better with the Huanan market (since the whole "Line 2" narrative isn't all that stupid)