COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.243 [SLACK_000457] · slack_pm:msg:02536

Page text: p.243 · original PDF

Date
2020-10-30 16:34
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen
Topics
Vaccines

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

One thing "Steve" considers a potential hypothesis here is a "vaccine challenge trial" - which isn't totally idiotic. But we'd have known about some SARS2 related virus if that were the case.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
One thing "Steve" considers a potential hypothesis here is a "vaccine challenge trial" - which isn't totally idiotic. quoted / not their view quoted_external sentence carries quotation marks asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-10-30 16:30 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, once the tinfoil hats get hold of this. :boom:
  2. 2020-10-30 16:31 Edward C. Holmes open
    But it also doesn't fit the WIV narrative as they don't do anything with the BGI.
  3. 2020-10-30 16:33 Edward C. Holmes open
    And the BGI are not even in Wuhan.
  4. 2020-10-30 16:33 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, I don't really see how any of this fits with WIV (other than it being close to PLA). It fits better with the Huanan market (since the whole "Line 2" narrative isn't all that stupid)
  5. 2020-10-30 16:34 Kristian G. Andersen
    One thing "Steve" considers a potential hypothesis here is a "vaccine challenge trial" - which isn't totally idiotic. But we'd have known about some SARS2 related virus if that were the case.
  6. 2020-10-30 16:35 Edward C. Holmes open
    Raccoon dogs in the market would be so simple....yes, the vaccine trial is mad.
  7. 2020-10-30 16:38 Edward C. Holmes open
    We know there must have cases around at that time. All those posterior diversity stuff is complete BS though. That Wade guy from the NYT kept rattling on about that.
  8. 2020-10-30 16:40 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, we know the early cases occurred back in the beginning of December, so it's certainly not completely mad tothink that somebody was investigating using sequencing around that time.
  9. 2020-10-30 16:42 Edward C. Holmes open
    But very likely in that there is just no footprint of this anywhere else...anyway, I've put the feelers out and I'll update you as soon as I hear anything.

Full conversation →