Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.240 [SLACK_000454] · slack_pm:msg:02502

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, I can check with Weifeng. I don't understand it, but I can't believe those dates are correct.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-30 14:44 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, that's kinda what I thought. There's no question these four runs were registered on 12/10 though - which iskinda peculiar.
2020-10-30 14:45 Kristian G. Andersen open

I thought maybe BGI would have made a bunch of registrations (because I assume they're sequencing from patients frequently), but that wasn't really the case - as far as I can see, only these four ones.
2020-10-30 14:45 Kristian G. Andersen open

E.g., this one: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biosamples/samples/SAMEA6507890
2020-10-30 14:48 Kristian G. Andersen open

Interesting list of collaborating institutions there too - I assume Weifeng is probably the person from Shandong.
2020-10-30 14:49 Edward C. Holmes

Yes, I can check with Weifeng. I don't understand it, but I can't believe those dates are correct.
2020-10-30 14:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

The dates are correct, I think - I don't think those can be wrong, since they're all recorded by the ENA - not thesubmitter.
2020-10-30 14:50 Andrew Rambaut open

Could ask Ewan Birney to look into it. Perhaps they have additional logs?
2020-10-30 14:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, probably. It _is_ kinda peculiar to me - these are also all young people.
2020-10-30 14:53 Edward C. Holmes open

When do they add the sample collection date?