A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
•Dec 25: Patient samples sent to (sequencing) Company A •Dec 26: Fragments of SARS-CoV-2 discovered by Company A •Dec 27: Full genome obtained by Company A •Dec 27, 28: Company A report to CDC and hospital in Wuhan •Dec 30: Company B sequence data from another patient •Dec 31: Company B's report (59 reads) "leaked" on social media
-
I think company B is the BGI.
-
Yeah, that's kinda what I thought. There's no question these four runs were registered on 12/10 though - which iskinda peculiar.
-
I thought maybe BGI would have made a bunch of registrations (because I assume they're sequencing from patients frequently), but that wasn't really the case - as far as I can see, only these four ones.
-
2020-10-30 14:45
Kristian G. Andersen
E.g., this one: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biosamples/samples/SAMEA6507890
-
Interesting list of collaborating institutions there too - I assume Weifeng is probably the person from Shandong.
-
Yes, I can check with Weifeng. I don't understand it, but I can't believe those dates are correct.
-
The dates are correct, I think - I don't think those can be wrong, since they're all recorded by the ENA - not thesubmitter.
-
Could ask Ewan Birney to look into it. Perhaps they have additional logs?