Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.241 [SLACK_000455] · slack_pm:msg:02506

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

When do they add the sample collection date?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-30 14:49 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, I can check with Weifeng. I don't understand it, but I can't believe those dates are correct.
2020-10-30 14:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

The dates are correct, I think - I don't think those can be wrong, since they're all recorded by the ENA - not thesubmitter.
2020-10-30 14:50 Andrew Rambaut open

Could ask Ewan Birney to look into it. Perhaps they have additional logs?
2020-10-30 14:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, probably. It _is_ kinda peculiar to me - these are also all young people.
2020-10-30 14:53 Edward C. Holmes

When do they add the sample collection date?
2020-10-30 14:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

Once they submit the data
2020-10-30 14:54 Kristian G. Andersen open

But the "creation date" is stamped in automatically - I don't think they'd have filled in any of the other information until they submitted the data - but that's a good question for Ewan
2020-10-30 14:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

All the assemblies are on the CNGB too - but no automatic dates stamped. https://db.cngb.org/search/project/CNP0000881/ (submitter being "Weijun Chen" - but obviously a million people with that name)
2020-10-30 14:55 Edward C. Holmes open

So, to be clear, what happened on 12/10? The BGI sent a file to EBI?