Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.240 [SLACK_000454] · slack_pm:msg:02499

Date: 2020-10-30 14:45
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I thought maybe BGI would have made a bunch of registrations (because I assume they're sequencing from patients frequently), but that wasn't really the case - as far as I can see, only these four ones.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-30 14:43 Edward C. Holmes open

Here are the sequencing dates that I am pretty bloody certain are correct:
2020-10-30 14:43 Edward C. Holmes open

•Dec 25: Patient samples sent to (sequencing) Company A •Dec 26: Fragments of SARS-CoV-2 discovered by Company A •Dec 27: Full genome obtained by Company A •Dec 27, 28: Company A report to CDC and hospital in Wuhan •Dec 30: Company B sequence data from another patient •Dec 31: Company B's report (59 reads) "leaked" on social media
2020-10-30 14:43 Edward C. Holmes open

I think company B is the BGI.
2020-10-30 14:44 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, that's kinda what I thought. There's no question these four runs were registered on 12/10 though - which iskinda peculiar.
2020-10-30 14:45 Kristian G. Andersen

I thought maybe BGI would have made a bunch of registrations (because I assume they're sequencing from patients frequently), but that wasn't really the case - as far as I can see, only these four ones.
2020-10-30 14:45 Kristian G. Andersen open

E.g., this one: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biosamples/samples/SAMEA6507890
2020-10-30 14:48 Kristian G. Andersen open

Interesting list of collaborating institutions there too - I assume Weifeng is probably the person from Shandong.
2020-10-30 14:49 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, I can check with Weifeng. I don't understand it, but I can't believe those dates are correct.
2020-10-30 14:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

The dates are correct, I think - I don't think those can be wrong, since they're all recorded by the ENA - not thesubmitter.

Full conversation →