COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.124 · slack_pm:msg:01265

Page text: p.124 · original PDF

Date
2020-07-30 15:46 (hour precision)
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

But at least Scott wasn't anonymous.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-07-30 15:46 Robert F. Garry open
    SLACK_000338 Agreed - let's see what the response from Clare is (good thing I finished a couple more reviews for her at the last minute) - then discuss the counter-punch.
  2. 2020-07-30 15:46 Robert F. Garry open
    > And, to borrow a phrase [from DT], "it's a pretty ugly situation that I (obviously) think should be exposed."
  3. 2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open
    Totally.
  4. 2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open
    So fed up with this shit. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-07-31 at 10.37.51 am.png]
  5. 2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes
    But at least Scott wasn't anonymous.
  6. 2020-07-30 15:46 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Haha - why do they even take the time to write this shit? I just don't get it...
  7. 2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open
    To TM " that _ are less insignificant than everyone else thinks they are. Perhaps I should link-up Scott with
  8. 2020-07-30 15:46 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Hah, worth a try
  9. 2020-07-30 15:46 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Poor Alina :wink:

Full conversation →