Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.124 · slack_pm:msg:01264

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

So fed up with this shit. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-07-31 at 10.37.51 am.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-07-30 15:18 Edward C. Holmes open

So am I. Frothing at the mouth.
2020-07-30 15:46 Robert F. Garry open

SLACK_000338 Agreed - let's see what the response from Clare is (good thing I finished a couple more reviews for her at the last minute) - then discuss the counter-punch.
2020-07-30 15:46 Robert F. Garry open

> And, to borrow a phrase [from DT], "it's a pretty ugly situation that I (obviously) think should be exposed."
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

Totally.
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes

So fed up with this shit. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-07-31 at 10.37.51 am.png]
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

But at least Scott wasn't anonymous.
2020-07-30 15:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Haha - why do they even take the time to write this shit? I just don't get it...
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

To TM " that _ are less insignificant than everyone else thinks they are. Perhaps I should link-up Scott with
2020-07-30 15:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Hah, worth a try