Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.123-124 [SLACK_000337] · slack_pm:msg:01261

Date: 2020-07-30 15:46
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

SLACK_000338 Agreed - let's see what the response from Clare is (good thing I finished a couple more reviews for her at the last minute) - then discuss the counter-punch.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-07-30 15:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, I think we all shaped that email pretty well! I definitely wouldn't be picking a fight with this bunch... Just saying. :boom::boxing_glove::man_in_business_suit_levitating:
2020-07-30 15:12 Edward C. Holmes open

Our fight is a righteous one.
2020-07-30 15:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm still pissed...
2020-07-30 15:18 Edward C. Holmes open

So am I. Frothing at the mouth.
2020-07-30 15:46 Robert F. Garry

SLACK_000338 Agreed - let's see what the response from Clare is (good thing I finished a couple more reviews for her at the last minute) - then discuss the counter-punch.
2020-07-30 15:46 Robert F. Garry open

> And, to borrow a phrase [from DT], "it's a pretty ugly situation that I (obviously) think should be exposed."
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

Totally.
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

So fed up with this shit. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-07-31 at 10.37.51 am.png]
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

But at least Scott wasn't anonymous.

Full conversation →