Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.124 · slack_pm:msg:01267

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

To TM " that _ are less insignificant than everyone else thinks they are. Perhaps I should link-up Scott with

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

Totally.
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

So fed up with this shit. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-07-31 at 10.37.51 am.png]
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

But at least Scott wasn't anonymous.
2020-07-30 15:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Haha - why do they even take the time to write this shit? I just don't get it...
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes

To TM " that _ are less insignificant than everyone else thinks they are. Perhaps I should link-up Scott with
2020-07-30 15:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Hah, worth a try
2020-07-30 15:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Poor Alina :wink:
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

I know. How bloody stupid to think that the HKU people did all the sequencing for RMYNO2 (RmYNO1) are were just acknowledged. Makes you wonder what else she has wrong. She's so far down rabbit hole that she's having trouble breathing.
2020-07-30 15:46 Edward C. Holmes open

I was in a bad mood after Scott's email.