COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.85 [SLACK_000299] · slack_pm:msg:00861

Page text: p.85 · original PDF

Date
2020-06-18 16:48
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes
Topics
Furin cleavage site and molecular featuresNatural origin / zoonotic spillover

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, it has. The two pangolin papers in Nature (different groups) both show the same RBD in the animals from Guangdong.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
The two pangolin papers in Nature (different groups) both show the same RBD in the animals from Guangdong. own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-06-18 16:18 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Speaking of animals and such - I don't know if some of you might want to chime in on this... https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1273632816983683079?s=20
  2. 2020-06-18 16:30 Edward C. Holmes open
    Not doing Twitter at the moment
  3. 2020-06-18 16:36 Edward C. Holmes open
    Had a quick look...if Alina is suggesting that the pangolin RBD came from humans she's totally mad (look at the synonymous diversity). 100% clear that that RBD is out there in nature. Not sure what hosts, but definitely in nature.
  4. 2020-06-18 16:42 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, I'm not sure what she's suggesting... Either from human or somebody invented the sequence. Hasn't that sequence been seen from multiple animals by multiple labs?
  5. 2020-06-18 16:48 Edward C. Holmes
    Yes, it has. The two pangolin papers in Nature (different groups) both show the same RBD in the animals from Guangdong.
  6. 2020-06-18 16:58 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Thought so...
  7. 2020-06-18 17:27 Kristian G. Andersen open
    This is pretty interesting... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-06-18 at 5.27.34 PM.png]
  8. 2020-06-18 17:32 Edward C. Holmes open
    But the pangolin sequence is only 'highly identical' at the amino acid level. Not synonymous sites...falls in the expected place at those sites.
  9. 2020-06-18 17:34 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, agreed - but if what she's saying is actually true, then that's definitely strange - that is *not* how the authors describe their data and samples

Full conversation →