Slack / Private Message Drop — page 609
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000823
← p.608 p.610 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[Kristian Andersen]
3% - that may well be every ~6 months given (a) exposures likely very low titer, and (b) seroreversion to CoVs. I
think it's safe to say that a huge number of people are exposed to CoVs on a daily basis - and not just in China.
[2021-03-20 09:34:59]
[Andrew Rambaut]
~5% serology seems to be the baseline false positive for just about everything - see Ebola in Sierra Leone etc.
[2021-03-20 09:35:30]
[Kristian Andersen]
... in Africa :wink:. That 2-3% number actually has pretty good baselines
[2021-03-20 09:36:00]
[Kristian Andersen]
Baseline sampled in e.g., Wuhan - of all places.
[2021-03-20 09:36:29]
[Andrew Rambaut]
OK - baseline cross-reactivity with some sort of CoV
[2021-03-20 09:36:52]
[Andrew Rambaut]
See waste-water in Europe in 2019
[2021-03-20 09:40:06]
[Kristian Andersen]
The 2-3% serological studies were specifically for SARS-like CoVs, with good baselines - so they might well be
accurate. But yeah, getting a positive hit on a CoV serological assay - without controlling very closely for background
- you can get anything, anywhere.
[2021-03-20 09:42:02]
[Kristian Andersen]
Andrew - since you have a keen eye. Do you know which 'mystery' sequences and viruses Jesse is talking about?
I'm quite confused. I think maybe he means these?
https://twitter.com/K_G_Andersen/status/1373310963680571397?s=20
Clearly they must be fragments they have managed to successfully sequence, as they mention in the Nature
addendum - so absolutely no mystery. Am I missing something?
[2021-03-20 09:43:44]
[Andrew Rambaut]
I was assuming it was those. Some RdRp PCR products I assume
[2021-03-20 09:44:18]
[Robert Garry]
Good to be discussing these points ahead of a likely burst of reporting with the relaese of the WHO report! I already
have several reporters promising to call.
[2021-03-20 09:45:52]
[Kristian Andersen]
... and then this slide showing that they have managed to get some spike sequences too? Clearly very distant.
[shared file(s): EvVevMrXcAA_GmP.jpeg]
[2021-03-20 09:46:51]
[Kristian Andersen]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/609
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:06366 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 608–609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06367 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06368 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06369 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06370 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06371 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06372 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06373 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06374 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06375 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06376 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609 |
| slack_pm:msg:06377 | 2021-03-20 | chat message | 609–610 |